Needs for the content regarding the clinical work associated with pupil. The part associated with manager

Needs for the content regarding the clinical work associated with pupil. The part associated with manager

The requirements for assessing pupil research

1. The therapy associated with the research. It’s important that even though utilizing the systemic and integration approaches, it ought to be a work with therapy, without a clear bias in general management, marketing, pedagogy, legislation, philology, etc.

2. The standard of relevance and practical importance of the study problems.

3. The standard of elaboration of theoretical product: overview of the literary works, comprehensively reflecting the developments of domestic and international researchers with this topic. Not just the literature referencing is welcomed, but additionally analysis, contrast and benchmarking the various views of researchers, on such basis as that your student formulates the writer’s place.

4. The connection between theoretical and empirical product. Relevance of the study susceptible to its content.

5. collection of diagnostic tools and research test.

6. The degree of research outcomes.

7. The amount of interpretation of research outcomes (level of analysis).

8. The standard of suggestions provided by the pupil potential audience.

9. Quality of work’s design.

10. The degree of research’s independence. The analysis must be carried out by the student individually, using the participation of other people just as topics or specialists. Duplication and copying of studies carried out by other writers (plagiarism) is strictly forbidden. The clear presence of components of independent clinical imagination, the formula and reason of their particular way of solving the debatable dilemmas associated with the concept and training of therapy, the separate nature associated with presentation associated with product as well as the formula of conclusions on the basis of the outcomes of the research are valued.

11. imaginative approach. You can find subjects which can be examined in numerous combinations by pupils from year to 12 months – they’re not appreciated. An interesting subject is respected, the choice of revolutionary techniques, writer’s techniques and just about every other manifestation of imagination.

Work are considered unsatisfactory by the after criteria.

1. Research is perhaps perhaps not emotional.

2. The research subject will not match its content.

3. The study was not carried out or partially carried out. Its email address details are perhaps perhaps not prepared or partially prepared. Its answers are prepared, yet not interpreted, or partially interpreted. The theoretical component will not match the empirical.

4. The text of this work will not meet custom-writings.org with the demands regarding the design culture: there are a great number of spelling errors, the written text is not modified, sloppy created.

5. The research is a complete or partial plagiarism. In the event that term paper is thought to be unsatisfactory, it is gone back to your pupil for modification.

If the pupil failed to pass the initial protection or even the commission discovered the job unsatisfactory, the pupil is certainly not permitted to protect and it is expelled through the college..

Duties associated with manager of term and last qualifying work

Relative to the theme associated with the term paper or FQW (last qualifying work) manager:

– provides the student an activity to organize for a term paper or a thesis, assists the pupil when you look at the growth of a calendar time-table for your amount of the FQW;

– suggests to your pupil the required basic literary works as well as other sources from the theme;

– suggests the pupil regarding the range of diagnostic tools and drawing up a policy for empirical research

– recommends the pupil regarding the company associated with research

– recommends the pupil regarding the processing and interpretation of empirical research outcomes

– checks the work in components so when a entire.

– For FQW writes review to the office and recommends the reviewer. The reviewer is planning overview of the task.

Dates and period of consultations are appointed by the manager or the mind regarding the division. Attention! In the event that pupil failed to meet up with the due dates set apart by the dean’s workplace for term paper or FQW, the manager gets the right not to ever provide solid advice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.